[HACKERS] logical replication: \dRp+ and "for all tables" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject [HACKERS] logical replication: \dRp+ and "for all tables"
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yXxu7=ApzqfFOOK4OUr+BPt3E8n2C--b3p-JmqmmWTyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical replication: \dRp+ and "for all tables"
List pgsql-hackers
If I create a publication "for all tables", \dRp+ doesn't indicate it is for all tables, it just gives a list of the tables.  

So it doesn't distinguish between a publication specified to be for all tables (which will be dynamic regarding future additions), and one which just happens to include all the table which currently exist.

That seems unfortunate.  Should the "for all tables" be included as another column in \dRp and \dRp+, or at least as a footnote tag in \dRp+ ?

Cheers,

Jeff




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication NOTICE "synchronized table states"