On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:> > I think that pg_stat_wal_receiver should be crossreferenced in > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/hot-standby.html, near the same > place which it crossreferences table 9-79. That would make it more > discoverable.Hm. Hot standby may not involve streaming replication. What about a paragraph here instead?https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html#streaming-replication In the monitoring subsection, we could tell that on a standby the WAL receiver status can be retrieved from this view when changes are streamed. What do you think?
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных