Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Isaac Morland
Subject Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date
Msg-id CAMsGm5fqa=a+vui7kqC-ZOJdrDVy=jBQteqEGmTY9bdVJSnRWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:58, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13 release, because
> there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13."

It would make me sad if the project kotowed to superstition like Oracle did.

Agreed. That being said, everybody knows you can't avoid the curse of 13 by re-numbering it - you simply have to avoid the version/floor/day/whatever after 12.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation versioning