Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YEk3R5D512ZmvcRxzkmCcudKDJdc2Z2dq0rUuKEXFRW3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results
Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results
List pgsql-hackers
On 28 December 2016 at 09:58, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:

> I've looked at this some more, and ITSM that the only way to do this without
> some major surgery is to create a new type of Destination specifically for
> SPI that allows for the execution of an arbitrary C function for each tuple
> to be sent.

That sounds a lot more sensible than the prior proposals. Callback driven.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues withcombined queries