Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YH_+NPbmkGSqNbtwut2d-1a8Y5TNDA_gkMpTgsDL9Bx2A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
List pgsql-hackers


On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
> reach consistency yet.
>

Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.

Attached no patch second time?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Next
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal