Re: BF mamba failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kouber Saparev
Subject Re: BF mamba failure
Date
Msg-id CAN4RuQt_Sr9h2NG0-fr7XSmU=DeHkzTeysCuOAWhWrkuhw8Puw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BF mamba failure  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Indeed, nothing exotic about our replication.

As for the object 4169049057, I am not able to find it anywhere in the catalogs. Perhaps it was something that was dropped in the meantime.

На чт, 7.08.2025 г. в 2:18 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написа:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 01:00:35PM +0300, Kouber Saparev wrote:
> We just had the same sudden replica shutdown, this time with version 17.3.
>
> 2025-08-02 22:10:02.229 UTC,,,473966,,67b3d76c.73b6e,14,,2025-02-18
> 00:42:20 UTC,8111/0,0,FATAL,XX000,"trying to drop stats entry already
> dropped: kind=relation dboid=16420 objoid=4169049057 refcount=1",,,,,"WAL
> redo at 6337E/9FF275E8 for Transaction/COMMIT: 2025-08-02

You are close to wraparound for this relation.  Is that vanilla
streaming replication with heap?
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?