Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Đặng Minh Hướng
Subject Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id CANHVJ5dMN66fo-hjs-QF4SxcHjBVkiBtMVYiDHHzAPH-4+7hkg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2018-04-11 10:16 GMT+09:00 Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Attached an updated test patch added the above test(0002 patch). Since
> for this test case it's enough to use existing test functions I didn't
> create new test functions. Also I found that the local data type name
> in log for data type conversion isn't qualified whereas the remote
> data type is always qualified. Attached 0001 patch fixes that.
>

The original issue has been fixed and this entry on CommitFest has
been marked as "Committed" but there are still works for improving
testing. Perhaps I should register a new entry of remaining patches to
next CommitFest.

Thanks. I appreciate it. 

---
Dang Minh Huong

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning