Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
Date
Msg-id CANWCAZaH7a30cuu+OmM=DKBM_X8A2o=EO9G=zVLDsJTi12nBaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind  ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 1:08 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> While seeing the buildfarm, I found that recently regression test for modules
> sometimes failed [1]. Typical example is [2] and failed at simd.h.
> The issue happened over branches, and they use gcc experimental. Based on that
> I felt recent commits for gcc might be related with.
>
> I don't have enough knowledge around here, but I saw commits in gcc and listed
> Candidates [4], [5], [6]. Can you find something from here?

We're not compiler engineers.

> Also, what should we do for nightly-built compilers? Will we fix tests or codes for them?

We might ask ourselves how often these have resulted in
forward-looking fixes for our code, weighed against spurious failures
and compiler bugs.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: M.Atıf Ceylan
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] psql: add size-based sorting options (O/o) for tables and indexes
Next
From: David Geier
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance issues with parallelism and LIMIT