On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 1:19 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
> Here are fixes to a few typos I found in the GiST README.
the child might have migrated as a result of concurrent splits of the
-parent, gistFindCorrectParent() is used to find the parent page.
+parent, so gistFindCorrectParent() is used to find the parent page.
-buffer attached to them. When a tuple is inserted at the top, the descend down
+buffer attached to them. When a tuple is inserted at the top, the descent down
LGTM
being empty. Whenever we find one, we acquire a lock on the parent and child
-page, re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the
+page, then re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the
downlink and mark the child as deleted, and release the locks.
I still find this a bit awkward -- perhaps "and re-check"? The last
sentence could do with just the last "and" as well, I think, but
that's a style consideration and not a grammar fix.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services