pg_stats.correlation rule of thumb for re-clustering a table? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ron Johnson
Subject pg_stats.correlation rule of thumb for re-clustering a table?
Date
Msg-id CANzqJaCEvOm_zY7Ex_vN3r5cQLzWx9DxYd3hV=pwPmm4wsJGWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_stats.correlation rule of thumb for re-clustering a table?
List pgsql-admin
(By re-cluster, I of course mean pg_repack.)

Purely OLTP tables (that are only accessed randomly) can of course live with 0% correlation, but lots of tables are mixed-use, and so benefit from physical ordering on a carefully chosen field..

SELECT abs(correlation)::numeric(3,2) as correlation
FROM pg_stats
WHERE schemaname = 'foo' AND tablename = 'bar'
  AND attname = 'blarge';
 correlation
-------------
        0.84
(1 row)

Obviously 84% is no need to worry, but what about 60% or 40%? Currently, I use 60%, but would like to do better.

--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbouncer
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stats.correlation rule of thumb for re-clustering a table?