Re: pg_restore scan - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_restore scan |
Date | |
Msg-id | CANzqJaDXaJ1kr=xmaRCcqPcioCVGo4ew2Ksa+_cd4KnPtKR0mQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_restore scan (R Wahyudi <rwahyudi@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-general |
It's towards the end of this long mailing list thread from a couple of weeks ago.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 8:58 AM R Wahyudi <rwahyudi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,Thanks for the quick and accurate response! I never been so happy seeing IOwait on my system!I might be blind as I can't find information about 'offset' in pg_dump documentation.Where can I find more info about this?Regards,RiantoOn Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 13:48, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:PG 17 has integrated zstd compression, while --format=directory lets you do multi-threaded dumps. That's much faster than a single-threaded pg_dump into a multi-threaded compression program.(If for _Reasons_ you require a single-file backup, then tar the directory of compressed files using the --remove-files option.)On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:50 PM R Wahyudi <rwahyudi@gmail.com> wrote:Sorry for not including the full command - yes , its piping to a compression command :| lbzip2 -n <threadsforbzipgoeshere>--best > <filenamegoeshere>I think we found the issue! I'll do further testing and see how it goes !On Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 11:02, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:So, piping or redirecting to a file? If so, then that's the problem.pg_dump directly to a file puts file offsets in the TOC.This how I do custom dumps:cd $BackupDirpg_dump -Fc --compress=zstd:long -v -d${db} -f ${db}.dump 2> ${db}.logOn Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 8:54 PM R Wahyudi <rwahyudi@gmail.com> wrote:pg_dump was done using the following command :
pg_dump -Fc -Z 0 -h <host> -U <user> -w -d <database>On Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 08:36, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:On 9/16/25 15:25, R Wahyudi wrote:
>
> I'm trying to troubleshoot the slowness issue with pg_restore and
> stumbled across a recent post about pg_restore scanning the whole file :
>
> > "scanning happens in a very inefficient way, with many seek calls and
> small block reads. Try strace to see them. This initial phase can take
> hours in a huge dump file, before even starting any actual restoration."
> see : https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E48B611D-7D61-4575-A820-
> B2C3EC2E0551%40gmx.net <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/
> E48B611D-7D61-4575-A820-B2C3EC2E0551%40gmx.net>
This was for pg_dump output that was streamed to a Borg archive and as
result had no object offsets in the TOC.
How are you doing your pg_dump?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com--Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.Don't boil me, I'm still alive.<Redacted> lobster!--Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.Don't boil me, I'm still alive.<Redacted> lobster!
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
pgsql-general by date: