Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Beena Emerson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id CAOG9ApHhdgauqAkTfDLrBG+ZXKdqZPLMEHySxWctC+=1UfoDDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:e format and expand the range?

I don't think me saying it felt a bit slow around 256 MB is a proper
technical analysis that should lead to the conclusion that that upper
limit should be 128 MB. ;-)

I ran a couple of tests for 16MB and 1GB and found less than 4% performance dip. I am currently running test to check consistency of the results and for various sizes. I will update soon.  

--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical decoding on standby
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker