Re: Replication with non-read-only standby. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Replication with non-read-only standby.
Date
Msg-id CAOR=d=1v6=1fgBs_1z_ymx4vtUuRuhAxWg3vOcgY-XXiczJ8bg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Replication with non-read-only standby.  (Nick Babadzhanian <nb@cobra.ru>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Nick Babadzhanian <nb@cobra.ru> wrote:
> Setup:
> 2 PostgreSQL servers are geographically spread. The first one is used for an application that gathers data. It is
connectedto the second database that is used to process the said data. Connection is not very stable nor is it fast, so
usingBidirectional replication is not an option. It is OK if data is shipped in batches rather than streamed. 
>
> Question:
> Is there a way to make the standby server non-read-only, so that it can keep getting updates (mostly inserts) from
the'master', but users are able to edit the data stored on 'slave'? Is there some alternative solution to this? 

I'd probably solve this with slony.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd
Date:
Subject: Re: Stored procedure version control
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Stored procedure version control