Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+k=7qOgczS_=CTbQAFJKDeju=kgnFrYd+HM-X0x+ROLnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Changing the warning to an error wouldn't bother me a great deal, but
> > we'd probably need more than just you voting for that alternative to
> > justify overturning longstanding behavior.
>
> Agreed.

I think I'm starting to lean in the direction of "error rather than
warning", personally... Not a real vote yet; I'm not sure I understand
the compatibility fallout. Like, who would be angry if we did that?

No opinion on group read. But we should absolutely clarify the warning message.

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: GetNamedLWLockTranche crashes on Windows in normal backend
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)