Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+khx0=unNhquZyKCCg6AMmnaqvyOZ7V2w0ps0VrONnN+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography  (Filip Janus <fjanus@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 2:26 AM Filip Janus <fjanus@redhat.com> wrote:
> While fixing the actual issue will take some time, I’ve fixed the requested test.
> Since I’m still quite new to the PG community, would it make sense to propose a patch that only adds the test?

You mean like in a TODO: block in the test? Maybe, but in my opinion
the damage to configure alone is not worth the benefit for this case,
until the test is passing. (And if OpenSSL were to change to provide a
digest through its API, as briefly mentioned in the IETF discussion,
the new test might not actually test any new code.)

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source
Next
From: Jim Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt