Re: [PATCH] Improve code coverage of network address functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Part of my thought here is that these functions are not worth their
> very own TAP test, with all the overhead that implies of firing up
> a new database instance.  So I was looking for something we could
> fold them into.

By themselves, yeah, probably not. Having a separate place for a
TCP-focused suite might decrease the activation energy for testing
other network features, though.

In any case, Aleksander, I don't mean to sign you up for all that; the
`ssl` suite also seems good enough to me if you're interested in
pursuing that side of the patch further.

Thanks!
--Jacob