Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdt35iVsGdeZVD_Edw0zimxi6kZkczZ3ec0D_jAam_68Nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-04-06 20:39:26 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2018-04-06 12:22:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > And as Robert has reminded me often that committers do not possess a
> > > veto that they can simply use to remove patches, there have been no
> > > reasonable grounds to revoke anything.
> >
> > Nor does a single committer overrule three other committers raising
> > doubts. Without even xresponding to their concerns.
> >
>
> BTW, what had happend to the idea of RMT voting for reverting patches?

My understanding is that the RMT managed period only really starts after
the 7th, once feature frozen.  And I think it's highly desirable to
attempt resolving disputes without resorting to such force, if possible.

Got it, thank you for the explanation.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Documentation for bootstrap data conversion