Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduqJ9QCOrXDjkPxPRxJRws1FgFELwB2Yz3L6-n7FQMsrA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:44 AM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
> > I think, this patch was marked as "Waiting on Author", probably, by mistake. Since recent changes were done without
anysignificant code changes and CF bot how happy again. 
> >
> > I'm going to move it to RfC, could I? If not, please tell why.
>
> I restored the "Ready for Committer" state. I don't think it's a good
> practice to change the state every time the patch has a slight
> conflict or something. This is not helpful at all. Such things happen
> quite regularly and typically are fixed in a couple of days.

This patch seems useful to me.  I went through the thread, it seems
that all the critics are addressed.

I've rebased this patch.   Also, I've run perltidy for tests, split
long errmsg() into errmsg(), errdetail() and errhint(), and do other
minor enchantments.

I think this patch is ready to go.  I'm going to push it if there are
no objections.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace references to malloc() in libpq documentation with generic language