> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of volunteer@spatiallink.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:33 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] an other provokative question??
>
> Relational database pioneer says technology is obsolete
>
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&
ar
> ticleId=9034619
>
> kindlt explain how??
This bit is a hint:
"Column-oriented databases -- such as the one built by Stonebraker's
latest start-up, Andover, Mass.-based Vertica Systems Inc. -- store data
vertically in table columns rather than in successive rows."
Mr. Stonebraker's company sells column oriented databases. So of course
the other methods must be "obsolete".
It actually is a good idea for some operations. Database warehouses
seem to benefit from that storage scheme. All of the database systems
that I know of that use this column-oriented scheme are in-memory
database systems. I don't know if Mr. Stonebraker's is also.
There is at least one open source database that uses columns to store
the data:
http://monetdb.cwi.nl/
