Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id D52A9851-E4C5-40CD-98E5-F6BC0417ED0F@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 30 Jan 2023, at 06:55, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:

> I started to spend time on this feature again. Thanks all for your
> comments so far.

Since there hasn't been any updates for the past six months, and the patch
hasn't applied for a few months, I am marking this returned with feedback for
now.  Please feel free to open a new entry in a future CF for this patch when
there is a new version.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen