Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tristan Partin
Subject Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register
Date
Msg-id D555PB7PK59U.39ZL3TA0X6NC2@partin.io
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri Oct 25, 2024 at 3:04 PM CDT, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes:
>> Should the removal of "register" be backported to support that better?
>
> Perhaps.  It's early days yet, but nobody has complained that that
> broke anything in v16, so I'm guessing it'd be fine.

FWIW, I ran into this compiling an extension written in C++ for v15, so
I'll throw my support for backpatching this if that is still on the
table. Understandable if not, though.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register