RE: running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Dave VanAuken |
---|---|
Subject | RE: running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2 |
Date | |
Msg-id | DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNGENLCLAA.dave@hawk-systems.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2 (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>) |
Responses |
SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD
4.2)
|
List | pgsql-general |
Knew about #1... and I'm not holding my breath for change gicing where the development on that angle is heading. In the installation directory for the jail i don't have the /storage directory, or for that matter the ipc.h file anywhere in the pgsql tree (both in the jail and host installations). The version installed was 7.0.2 What about hacking supplimentary installations and hardcoding new offsets for each subsequent installation of pgsql (can't even look into that until i detemine where the ipc.h code now exists). Appreciate the input... the best description so far from the pgsql pov regarding the situation... have been working almost entirely from the fbsd pov up until not and running out of options. May be a wash for using pgsql in this situation. Dave -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Alex Pilosov Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 1:50 PM To: Dave VanAuken Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2 Here's the story about pgsql and jail: 1. FreeBSD shared memory is _really_ shared across all jail VMs. I think its not going to change, as this seems like a great way for processes to exchange data...But I could be wrong. :) 2. Postgres uses some funky math to determine which shmid to use for different memory allocations it needs. The problem with that it has no idea about jails and will not generate a different shmid for different processes, so postgres processes end up stepping on each other's toes. See include/storage/ipc.h, definition of SystemPortAddressGetIPCKey, and you'll understand what I mean. To properly fix this, I think this should be done: Another (optional) backend parameter which should determine offset (hardcoded now to 17491) for allocation of different shmids... comments? TODO? On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Dave VanAuken wrote: > Have a FreeBSD 4.2 box... have created two Virtual machines with the > jail process. > Apache and PHp configure and execute fine, but am having some > configuration and execution problems with pgsql... not sure if I am > missing something or if pgsql just cannot deal with being in the jail > and sharing the sysv memory > > Attempting to manually start the postmaster produces the following: > > %postmaster -i > IpcMemoryCreate: shmget failed (Function not implemented) key=5432010, > size=144, permission=700 > This type of error is usually caused by an improper > shared memory or System V IPC semaphore configuration. > For more information, see the FAQ and platform-specific > FAQ's in the source directory pgsql/doc or on our > web site at http://www.postgresql.org. > IpcMemoryIdGet: shmget failed (Function not implemented) key=5432010, > size=144, permission=0 > IpcMemoryAttach: shmat failed (Function not implemented) id=-2 > FATAL 1: AttachSLockMemory: could not attach segment > % > > Have modified the sysctl.conf file to allow usage of sysv memory, but > as it is already shared from the host machine, this may be causing > pgsql to barf on it. > > Searching for jail faq's and posts regarding this matter produces some > close, but not helpful posts regarding chroot'ed environments. > > Any insights, requests for details, and assistance are appreciated. > > Dave > >
pgsql-general by date: