Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tristan Partin
Subject Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Date
Msg-id DDZP25P4VZ48.3LWMZBGA1K9RH@partin.io
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
After my analysis in the other subthread, patch 1 looks ready to be
committed. Patch 2 looks good to go, but maybe you should split the "set
-e" changes into a separate commit. Not sure how much I like patch
3 since it hardcodes $libdir as "lib" for the purposes of finding the
header, but it's also kind of a last resort thing, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Maybe
it's best if the meson build just copies whatever the autotools build
does?

--
Tristan Partin
Databricks (https://databricks.com)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance
Next
From: Sadhuprasad Patro
Date:
Subject: Re: Improved TAP tests by replacing sub-optimal uses of ok() with better Test::More functions