pgsql: Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From David Rowley
Subject pgsql: Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code
Date
Msg-id E1k23gR-0001Bh-0K@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code

Windows 64bit has 4-byte long values which is not suitable for tracking
disk space usage in the incremental sort code. Let's just make all these
fields int64s.

Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpky%2BUhof8mryPf5i%3D6e6fib2dxHqBrhp0Qhu0NeBhLJw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13, where the incremental sort code was added

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6ee3b5fb990ea11992b0db960d79b1fbe7b5e8e5

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/commands/explain.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
src/include/nodes/execnodes.h  |  8 ++++----
src/include/utils/tuplesort.h  |  2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix some issues with step generation in partition pruning.