Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Pirotte
Subject Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
Date
Msg-id E7D0948B-F256-42AE-978B-88AE9856BA6C@mediamatters.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
List pgsql-performance
Thanks for the quick responses.  :-)  The data is almost identical, between the two servers: 8.2.3 has 882198 records, 8.2.4 has 893121.  For background, I pg_dump'ed the data into the 8.2.4 server yesterday, and analyzed with the stats target of 250, then reanalyzed with target 10.   So, the statistics should theoretically be ok.  Running a vacuum full analyze on referrer_paths, per Kristo's suggestion, didn't affect the query plan.   

We downgraded to 8.2.3 just to rule that out, upped stats target to 100, analyzed, and are still experiencing the same behavior -- it's still coming up with the same bogus rowcount estimates.  Over the weekend I'll lower the memory and see if that does anything, just to rule that out...  Any other thoughts?  Thanks so much for your time and suggestions thus far.

Cheers,
Dave

On May 25, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> writes:
It looks like the estimated cost is lower for 8.2.4 -- could it be that the
fact that he's giving it more memory lead to the planner picking a plan that
happens to be worse?

Offhand I don't think so.  More work_mem might make a hash join look
cheaper (or a sort for a mergejoin), but the problem here seems to be
that it's switching away from a hash and to a nestloop.  Which is a
loser because there are many more outer-relation rows than it's
expecting.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at



Dave Pirotte
Director of Technology
Media Matters for America
phone: 202-756-4122


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problem on 8.2.4, but not 8.2.3
Next
From: lists@on-track.ca
Date:
Subject: Adding disks/xlog & index