> That might happen eventually, but I'm not all that eager to convert
> the postmaster into a (half-baked) substitute for cron. My experience
> as a dbadmin is that you need various sorts of routinely-run maintenance
> tasks anyway; VACUUM is only one of them. So you're gonna need some
> cron tasks no matter what. If we try to make the postmaster responsible
> for this sort of thing, we're going to end up reimplementing cron.
> I think that's a waste of effort.
Except that you can only set cron jobs to run every hour, etc. The DBA
might want to set it to run after say 5% of the rows in a table are
updated/deleted, etc. It is an esoteric feature, I know, but it'd be cool.
Chris
