Hi Robert,
> On Jan 26, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>> Yeah, that's really deceptive.
>>
>> Skimming the paper, it also does not mention which versions of the software
>> are being used. Ideally how the DBs were configured on the hardware
>> would be great to see too, but that may be asking too much.
>
> That's because they didn't use *any* version of PostgreSQL. They
> tested something that they claim works *like* PostgreSQL but is
> actually not the PostgreSQL code.
To clarify, that comment was based on all the databases they were using,
not just PostgreSQL.
Thanks,
Jonathan
