Re: Snapshot too old logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brad DeJong
Subject Re: Snapshot too old logging
Date
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB57BD8@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Snapshot too old logging  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Snapshot too old logging
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think I was suggesting: One or more rows required by this query may
> already have been removed from "%s".

I keep reading that as "you have data corruption because something removed rows that your query needs" rather than
"thisquery took too long to complete but may succeed if you resubmit it".
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?