FW: oracle ate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From elein
Subject FW: oracle ate
Date
Msg-id MABBJCMLMNABIPABODDHAEENCAAA.elein@nextbus.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: FW: oracle ate
List pgsql-hackers
Hmm, no response on pgsql-general.  Anyone up on
oracle's implementation?

elein
==================
Elein Mustain
elein@nextbus.com
(510)420-3120 

-----Original Message-----
From: elein [mailto:elein@nextbus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:41 PM
To: pgsql-general@hub.org
Cc: elein
Subject: oracle ate



Does anyone have a writeup or deconstruction of the
implementation of Oracle's extensibility capabilities?

I am a long time ordbms proponent (illustra, informix and
now postgresql).  And I have heard mixed information
regarding Oracle's extensibility. Do they use a unified 
type system?   Are cartriges separate processes? Do the 
separate processes (if they are) share memory with the 
server process or is all the communication through pipish 
things. If I don't use their standard cartridges (image, 
text, video) how easy is it to write my own.  Any GIS 
specific pro or con info w/Oracle?  Am I asking the right
questions?

I would like to put the questions to rest and get on with it.

Feel free to point me to the right audience or source if
this is not a good question for this group.

thanks

elein@nextbus.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX compile ?? libcrypt HELP !!
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Delimited identifier length