RE: INET/CIDR types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Larry Rosenman |
---|---|
Subject | RE: INET/CIDR types |
Date | |
Msg-id | NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAAELHHIAA.ler@lerctr.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: INET/CIDR types (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)) |
Responses |
Re: INET/CIDR types
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
What RFC says you can't print all 4 octets of a CIDR Netnumber? Why does network(cidr) return the whole cidr output just like select cidr? I'm just trying to figure out the logic here. Here is what my Cisco Router that speaks BGP says: big-bro#term ip netmask-format bit-count big-bro#sh ip bg 206.66.0.0/20 BGP routing table entry for 206.66.0.0/20, version 150832 Paths: (5 available, best #4) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 157.130.140.109 166.63.135.33 206.66.12.3 206.66.12.4206.66.12.7 206.66.12. 8 Local, (aggregated by 4278 206.66.12.3), (received & used) 206.66.12.3 from 206.66.12.3 (206.66.12.3) Origin IGP,localpref 0, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate Local, (aggregated by 4278 206.66.12.7), (received & used) 206.66.12.7from 206.66.12.7 (206.66.12.7) Origin IGP, localpref 0, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate Local, (aggregatedby 4278 206.66.12.8), (received & used) 206.66.12.8 from 206.66.12.8 (206.66.12.8) Origin IGP, localpref0, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate Local, (aggregated by 4278 206.66.12.1) 0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (206.66.12.1) Origin IGP, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, aggregated, local, atomic- aggregate, best Local, (received & used) 206.66.12.4 from 206.66.12.4 (206.66.12.4) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref100, valid, internal big-bro# I am just asking for the same type output. Why is this so hard? The info is in the type, and the print routine wouldn't be so hard. I can probably write the function in less than 1 hour, but getting it integrated is my stumbling block. -----Original Message----- From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain [mailto:darcy@druid.net] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 3:18 PM To: Larry Rosenman Cc: Don Baccus; pgsql-hackers@hub.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INET/CIDR types Thus spake Larry Rosenman > I was hoping to have some niceties out of the SQL retrieve to print directly > in PHP, and not have to massage it. > > Why is there such animosity to printing out all 4 octets in some function > somewhere for a CIDR block? You keep saying "hostility" as if we are ganging up against you. Believe me, I have no animosity towards you and I am sure no one else has either. We are resisting the change you want simply because it would violate the RFC which we agreed to follow when we created the types. If you think this is hostile, you will probably think that the original discussions in the archives are nuclear war :-). If you would like to look it over make sure to set aside a lot of time. We spent a long time hashing this out. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
pgsql-hackers by date: