From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for the
> > same.
> >
>
> I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as this is not
> reported by any user and we have found it during code review so it seems
> either users don't have an exact use case or they haven't noticed this yet. What
> do you people think about back-patching?
Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.
> Attached, please find a slightly updated patch with minor changes. I have
> slightly changed the test to make it more meaningful.
The patch looks good to me.
Best regards,
Hou zj
