Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Kenji T. Hollis |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.95.980215021202.11279A-100000@Gawain.Houston-InterWeb.COM Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha (Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat@nag.cs.colorado.edu>) |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha
Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Ryan: > As for you, Kenji, (not to be a jerk, but instead a reality > check) just calm down and be patient, or jump in and > help us (i.e. email Jeff and ask him what you can do to help, or get a > new version of pgsql, apply the patch included in this email, and report > back to us what happens). Nothing gets done by people continously asking > for something to be done. And anyway, porting to the alpha, a 64bit > architecture is not simple to say the very least. Add to that, a very > large (I think 100k+ lines of code has been stated before) and powerful > database to port, and things reach the near impossible point. We will get > it figured out in due time, but we don't have 50 programmers working away > at this all day long. Then again, you are not paying anything for the > database. So I think things are fair. :) I totally understand where you're coming from, however, I wrote over 4 months ago reporting the problem, and was kind of brushed off like it was a non-issue, and I reported it twice. Same thing twice. Finally, I raise hell about it and I get a response. I'm not impatient. I am currently using msql for what I need and it seems to be getting the job done. I just need somethimg much more powerful. PostGres is much more powerful. I'm trying to help, but the first message I get was from some idiot on this list who told me to fix the problem myself and quit whining. I don't take kindly to people who write messages like those to me, especially when I'm trying to help resolve an issue with the coders. I don't deserve to be treated with this disrespect, and I never shoot back at any question I get - the most I'll do is delete the message and bite my damn tongue. So, now that you understand my position, I just wanted an update, and wanted to help fix the problem. > PS. Kenji, where did you get that pgsql would be running on Linux/Alpha in > Jan '98? I have never seen any such projected date! One of the coders told me this privately. I wish I had saved that message! -- Ken ------ ========================================================================= Houston InterWeb Design, Inc. || Office: +1 (713) 627-9494 Lead Programmer/Designer || Fax: +1 (713) 627-2744 C++, Windows, and Web Programming || Pager: +1 (713) 727-2529 ========================================================================= Home page URL: http://www.houston-interweb.com/
pgsql-hackers by date: