Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0002211640510.86931-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to TODO list / why 7.0 ?  (Kaare Rasmussen <kar@webline.dk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Long Overdue ;)


On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:

> Having been away for some time I'm very anxious to see that there's a 7.0
> release coming very soon. I extracted the TODO list from the CVS (latest update
> February 9).  The only really really big issue as I see it is referential
> integrity. This is big, I admit but why going to 7.0 for this? Or is it because
> it's long overdue (MSVC and stuff)?
> 
> There are other things that must have taken a lot of work, only it's not
> mainstream the same way referential integrity is (PL/Perl and more). I had
> hoped to find outer joins, but look forward to the next release if it will be
> there.
> 
> Maybe I missed something in the TODO list or in the fixed list, but I couldn't
> find VIEWs with UNIONs, which I understand would be solved by a rewrite of the
> rules system.
> 
> ************
> 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?