Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Subject | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101111919540.21628-100000@thelab.hub.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
Responses |
Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > just downloaded it and can't find any regression tests ... ? > > it's in the contrib-intarray.tar.gz > gmake, gmake install, gmake installcheck erk, can we get this somehow done in such a way that its part of the *standard* regression tests? so when ppl do 'make test', the GiST stuff is checked also? My worry, as with others, isn't that GiST itself is broken by the changes, its that *somehow* there is an interaction that is with the rest of the system that isn't being tested ... > > > Oleg > > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > > > > > Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: > > > > > > I understand Tom's arguments and respect his experience, so I think it's > > > > > > possible to put link to my page in 7.1 docs for people interested in > > > > > > GiST features. > > > > > > > > > > Bear in mind that I only have one core vote ;-). We've already had some > > > > > private core discussion about whether to accept this patch now, and so > > > > > far I think I'm outvoted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are several Tom Lane, judge by your activity. You probably need > > > > several votes. > > > > > > > > > Did I understand you to say that you'd added some regression tests for > > > > > GiST? That would lessen my unhappiness a little bit ... > > > > > > > > Yes, we did. Currently all files are available from my page > > > > http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/ > > > > I could submit them to hackers list if CORE people got consensus > > > > > > Okay, if there are appropriate regression tests, I'm going to say go for > > > it ... > > > > > > Does anyone have any objections to my downloading the tar file (doing that > > > now), committing the changes and wrapping up a quick Beta4 just so that we > > > have a tar ball that is testable right away? > > > > > > Save Lamar and the other packagers a bit of work by avoiding beta3 > > > packages :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > > > Regards, > Oleg > _____________________________________________________________ > Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, > Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) > Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ > phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
pgsql-hackers by date: