failure notice (fwd) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Who the hell are these people and why can't they configure their
own MTA?

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net        56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking     http://www.camping-usa.com      http://www.cloudninegifts.com  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
 http://www.unknown-artists.com
 
==========================================================================



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 15 Aug 2002 16:47:22 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@ic.kharkov.ua
To: vev@michvhf.com
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ic.kharkov.ua.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Connected to 192.204.191.242 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550 5.0.0 Go away, your mailserver is broken

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <vev@michvhf.com>
Received: (qmail 62268 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000
Received: from dialup44.kharkov.ukrpack.net (HELO dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua) (212.1.112.156) by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with
SMTP;15 Aug 2002 16:46:47 -0000
 
Received: from dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (DUAL [172.16.200.1]) by dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
InternetMail Service Version 5.5.2448.0)id Q926YA3A; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:46:07 +0300
 
Received: by dual.shena.ic.kharkov.ua (Microsoft Exchange Connector for POP3 Mailboxes 4.50.2113) with SMTP (Global
POP3Download) id MSG08152002-194556-214.MMD@shena.ic.kharkov.ua; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:45:56 +0300
 
Return-Path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M26848@postgresql.org>
Delivered-To: pop-users-shena@ic.kharkov.ua
Received: (qmail 61671 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Delivered-To: shena-shevtchenko@shena.ic.kharkov.ua
Received: (qmail 61668 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Received: from postgresql.org (64.49.215.8) by mail.ic.kharkov.ua with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 16:39:03 -0000
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 419EF47654E; Thu, 15
Aug2002 12:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
 
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTPid A2668475F2D; Thu,
15Aug 2002 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
 
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE137475974for
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:44 -0400 (EDT)
 
Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (adsl-67-36-71-182.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [67.36.71.182])by postgresql.org
(Postfix)with SMTP id DCB8947594Dfor <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:43 -0400 (EDT)
 
Received: (qmail 55151 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Aug 2002 16:38:45 -0000
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>,PostgreSQL-development
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items
In-Reply-To: <200208151616.g7FGGW500908@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.40.0208151235180.52449-100000@paprika.michvhf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a
> > > trailing '@', so here is a patch that implements that.  It has the
> > > advantages of:
> >
> > Probably because not everyone saw it.  I know I didn't.  This entire
> > issue is growing more and more complex.  How about a configure item
> > to not even compile it in?  Or better yet, a configure item to put
> > it there with the default off.
>
> I think I am prety close, and I don't see a configure flag as any better
> than a GUC option that is off by default.

But how many people would even use it?  I can't see adding the bloat
unnecessarily and risking it accidently being turned on.  Am I wrong
and really alot of people actually want/need this?

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net        56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking     http://www.camping-usa.com      http://www.cloudninegifts.com  http://www.meanstreamradio.com
 http://www.unknown-artists.com
 
==========================================================================




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org