Re: In memory Database for postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: In memory Database for postgres
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0811171822200.17260@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: In memory Database for postgres  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> Just wondering if you compared it to how fast it runs if you've got
> lots of shared_buffers and everything fits into memory.  That would be
> an interesting comparison.

With a large increase in work_mem as well to speed up sorting.  If the
bottleneck is write speed on the intermediate results mentioned, then it
may very well be the case that the best way to accelerate this workload is
with a RAM-based tablespace.  But in some cases tuning shared_buffers and
work_mem way upwards is all it takes.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: In memory Database for postgres
Next
From: Blazej
Date:
Subject: Re: In memory Database for postgres