Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From A James Lewis
Subject Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.93.990610160824.4937B-100000@vr1-workhorse1.vrtx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)  (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>)
Responses Re: Real Programmers (was: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6)
List pgsql-hackers
Hey, why don't you just overwrite the jmp instruction with a nop....

On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Vadim Mikheev wrote:

> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > 
> > > Actually, I just don't think that breaks in loops are always better
> > > than gotos.
> > >
> > > >     Vadim  is  surely one of the real programmers in our project.
> > > >     It's not only that he isn't  afraid  using  GOTO's.  He  also
> > >
> > > Like someone didn't afraid to use siglongjmp in elog.c.
> > 
> >     There  are  much  better  ones in the PL handlers! memcpy()'s
> >     mangling sigjmp_buf's between sigsetjmp() siglongjmp() stuff.
> 
> Wow! Voodoo!
> I very like such things -:)
> This is really the way what Real Programmers follow -:)
> 
> Vadim
> 

A.J. (james@fsck.co.uk)
Ignorance is not knowing.
Stupidity is the active pursuit of ignorance.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] select order by for update
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem