Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Tom Good |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980604163303.9825A-100000@mailhost.nrnet.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS (Bruce Tong <zztong@laxmi.ev.net>) |
Responses |
Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time...
Re: [GENERAL] Not about LOGOs this time... |
List | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Bruce Tong wrote: > > > I have noticed this list has not provided effective support to PostgreSQL > > > beginners - not just myself, but others. > > What exactly is "effective support"? > I have noticed a number of seemingly beginning questions go unanswered. > Perhaps they were answered by direct mail. If so, I stand corrected. Bruce - I have, being generally obnoxious and pushy, asked for a newbie list for people like me-self: slow on the uptake but persistent. I have heard nothing back, except from Jose who liked the idea and apparently was willing to serve as a dispenser of info (which he does very well.) I would love such a list and would be willing to do whatever it takes, workwise, to make it a reality. Scrappy!? Is this possible? > > How many ppl actually read the documentation before posting the > I can't answer that, and you know it. In my case, I've read everything I > can find. I just got v6.3.2 so maybe theres a few I haven't found yet. If > I ask a question answered in the docs, please point it out, just don't > ignore the question. I'm happy to do the research. I read and re=read and even re-read but have had to basically d.i.y. except for some help from Tom (Linux questions) and Michael (major source of help for ecpg.) My questions are painfully-newbie and belong on a separate list... > > Lists are meant to be "self-help"...my general day right now is > > spent, more often then not, scanning through the subjects, reading those > I understand, and I'm not picking on a specific person here. I know that's > the way it is. Perhaps I'm spoiled by other lists. I'm willing to work! Dang it - I'm willing to help. Bruce, you willing to help if we can convince pgsql.org to let it transpire? > > > easier. At this point, early in my PostgreSQL experience, I would say > > > documentation is your weak suit. > > Have you looked at what is included in v6.3.2? > > Yes. As I said before, I've read everything I can find. That doesn't mean > it all made sense at first to me or that there aren't holes. This is my > first foray into SQL databases and database administration and I'm certain > I'm missing all sorts of details. Bruce - I have a tgz file that you can download if you're interested in what I have been able to do with perl/pgsql: www.panix.com/~ugd It's primitive but it works...there is a readme and links to archives (for perl modules), examples of code, and so on...handy stuff. Let me know if I can help in any way! Cheers, Tom =================================================================== User Guide Dog Database Project =================================================================== Project Coordinator: Peter J. Puckall <ppuckall@cableregina.com> Programmers: C/Perl: Paul Anderson <paul@geeky1.ebtech.net> SQL/Perl: Tom Good <tomg@q8.nrnet.org> HTML: Chris House <csh@geocities.com> SQL/Perl: Phil R. Lawrence <prl2@lehigh.edu> Perl: Mike List <troll@net-link.net> Progress 4GL: Robert March <rmarch@hawk.igs.net> =================================================================== Powered by PostgreSQL 6.3.2 // DBI-0.91::DBD-PG-0.69 // Perl5 ===================================================================
pgsql-general by date: