Re: Todo/missing? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Ola Sundell
Subject Re: Todo/missing?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0106261734190.4735-100000@miranda.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])  ("Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@nooper.com>)
Responses RE: Todo/missing?
List pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:56:18PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > I have to agree, we need to compile a todo list.
> >
> > Mine would include:
> >
> > 1) Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
> > 2) Updateable resultSet
> > 3) Improved DatabaseMetaData
>
> That looks pretty good from where I stand. I would perhaps separate
> out also, the fact that the ResultSet.insertXXX() methods also need to be
> implemented as well as the updateXXX methods. I guess this comes under
> the updateable resultSet but it's not clear.

I've been looking at the updateable ResultSet. The best way of
implementing it, imo, is adding (as I already mentioned) a property to
Field, which tells us where the Field is coming from. Without this, we'll
have to parse the SELECT, to see where the Field originated, and imo this
is way too complex to be done in the updateXXX methods. Unless anyone has
a better idea, I'll implement this.

I'm working on the updateable ResultSet as I'm writing this. Everything is
looking fine, although this might be a major overhaul. I'm re-reading the
jdbc-2.1 spec, and I am consuming immense amounts of Coca-Cola. We'll see
what it leads to.

Ola

--
Ola Sundell
ola@miranda.org - olas@wiw.org - ola.sundell@upright.se
http://miranda.org/~ola



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: RE: jdbc1 fix for BigDecimal scale bug
Next
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: RE: Todo/missing?