Corruption with duplicate primary key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alex Adriaanse |
---|---|
Subject | Corruption with duplicate primary key |
Date | |
Msg-id | SN6PR03MB3598C0DF07CA4FB1223D5790A95C0@SN6PR03MB3598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key
Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key |
List | pgsql-hackers |
We have a Postgres 10 database that we recently upgraded to Postgres 12 using pg_upgrade. We recently discovered that thereare rows in one of the tables that have duplicate primary keys: record_loader=# \d loader.sync Table "loader.sync" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default -------------------+--------------------------+-----------+----------+--------- source | text | | not null | natural_key | text | | not null | payload | jsonb | | | dispatched | timestamp with time zone | | not null | now() initial_load_id | text | | | deleted_load_id | text | | | created_timestamp | timestamp with time zone | | | now() updated_timestamp | timestamp with time zone | | | now() deleted_timestamp | timestamp with time zone | | | Indexes: "sync_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (source, natural_key) Publications: "debezium" This table is modified via triggers that fire off when a COPY command inserts many rows into another table. Here are two example duplicate rows: # SELECT xmin, xmax, cmin, cmax, source, md5(natural_key) AS natural_key_hash, dispatched, created_timestamp, updated_timestamp,deleted_timestamp FROM loader.sync WHERE (source, natural_key) = ('ok_lease', '...') ORDER BY xmin::text::int,cmin::text::int; -[ RECORD 1 ]-----+--------------------------------- xmin | 116649 xmax | 0 cmin | 5304404 cmax | 5304404 source | ok_lease natural_key_hash | de3e9a567b90025c3399c4c63c823fe9 dispatched | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 created_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 deleted_timestamp | -[ RECORD 2 ]-----+--------------------------------- xmin | 116649 xmax | 118583 cmin | 5312208 cmax | 5312208 source | ok_lease natural_key_hash | de3e9a567b90025c3399c4c63c823fe9 dispatched | 2019-11-10 05:09:24.214964+00 created_timestamp | 2019-05-17 21:24:19.558219+00 updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 deleted_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 It appears that the second row was in place originally, then got updated by a trigger (and even deleted later on, althoughit doesn't appear that the delete transaction got committed), and then the first row was inserted within the sametransaction that updated the second row. Another example: -[ RECORD 1 ]-----+--------------------------------- xmin | 116649 xmax | 0 cmin | 5304403 cmax | 5304403 source | ok_lease natural_key_hash | 1c8031348701a32cb5fee26839d6b0b4 dispatched | 2019-11-10 05:09:24.214964+00 created_timestamp | 2019-05-31 06:00:33.765547+00 updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 deleted_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 -[ RECORD 2 ]-----+--------------------------------- xmin | 116649 xmax | 0 cmin | 5304404 cmax | 5304404 source | ok_lease natural_key_hash | 1c8031348701a32cb5fee26839d6b0b4 dispatched | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 created_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00 deleted_timestamp | Both examples have in common that the two duplicate rows were touched within the same transaction. This database runs inside Docker, with the data directory bind-mounted to a reflink-enabled XFS filesystem. The VM is runningDebian's 4.19.16-1~bpo9+1 kernel inside an AWS EC2 instance. We have Debezium stream data from this database via pgoutput. Recreating the primary key confirms that the constraint doesn't (or at least shouldn't) permit these duplicate rows: record_loader=# BEGIN; BEGIN record_loader=# ALTER TABLE loader.sync DROP CONSTRAINT sync_pkey; ALTER TABLE record_loader=# ALTER TABLE loader.sync ADD CONSTRAINT sync_pkey PRIMARY KEY (source, natural_key); ERROR: could not create unique index "sync_pkey" DETAIL: Key (source, natural_key)=(ok_lease, ...) is duplicated. CONTEXT: parallel worker Any ideas on what might cause this behavior? Thanks, Alex
pgsql-hackers by date: