Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: COPY performance on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ryohei Takahashi (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: COPY performance on Windows
Date
Msg-id TY3PR01MB118912C0D2D55359C7AD3E73582182@TY3PR01MB11891.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COPY performance on Windows  (Vladlen Popolitov <v.popolitov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses RE: COPY performance on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,


I did more investigation on the COPY performance on Windows.

By using community distributed binaries, the COPY performance of PG16.6 and PG17.0 is worse than PG16.4.
However, by using the binaries build by myself, there are no difference.
So, it is not the problem about the source code after PG16.4.

On the other hand, I noticed that 82a4edabd2 is degrading COPY performance on Windows.

I will write the detail in the next e-mail.

Regards,
Ryohei Takahashi

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hex-coding optimizations using SVE on ARM.
Next
From: "Ryohei Takahashi (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: COPY performance on Windows