RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Date
Msg-id TYAPR01MB2990390CF2456EB228EF5A54FE469@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
From: Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> I agree that it's better to mark the function with correct parallel safety lable.
> Especially for the above functions which will be executed in parallel mode.
> It will be friendly to developer and user who is working on something related to
> parallel test.
>
> So, I attached the patch to mark the above functions parallel safe.

Thank you, the patch looks good.  Please register it with the next CF if not yet.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ian Zagorskikh
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings