On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 04:51, Michael Paquier <
michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 02:13:28PM +0000, gkokolatos@pm.me wrote:
> Good point. I thought about it before submitting the patch. I
> concluded that given the complexity and operations involved in
> LZ4Stream_read_internal() and the rest of t he pg_dump/pg_restore
> code, the memset() call will be negligible. However from the
> readability point of view, the function is a bit cleaner with the
> memset().
>
> I will not object to any suggestion though, as this is a very
> trivial point. Please find attached a v2 of the patch following the
> suggested approach.
Please note that an open item has been added for this stuff.
Thank you but I am not certain I know what that means. Can you please explain?
Cheers,
