Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable
Date
Msg-id YW+ROCXCtFshHvDx@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 02:40:04PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 10/18/21, 11:49 PM, "Matthijs van der Vleuten" <postgresql@zr40.nl> wrote:
>> The test case doesn't seem entirely correct to me? The index being
>> dropped (btree_tall_tbl_idx2) doesn't exist.
>
> This was fixed before it was committed [0].

Yes, my apologies about this brain fade.  The committed code is
hopefully fine :)

>> Also, I don't believe this tests the case of dropping the index when
>> it previously has been altered in this way.
>
> That can still fail with the "has no options" ERROR, and fixing it
> will still require a manual catalog update.  The ERROR is actually
> coming from the call to index_open(), so bypassing it might require
> some rather intrusive changes.  Given that it took over a year for
> this bug to be reported, I suspect it might be more trouble than it's
> worth.

This may need a mention in the release notes, but the problem is I
guess not that spread enough to worry or people would have complained
more since 13 was out.  Logical dumps discard that automatically and
even for the ANALYZE case, the pre-committed code would have just
ignored the reloptions retrieved by get_attribute_options().
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing build of MSVC with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better