On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 01:50:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > To improve things, it would be good if we could determine if LATERAL
> > will really fix the error, or at least detect one of the cases above we
> > have a clearer way to suggest a fix.
>
> Here's a proposed patch that tries to determine this by looking at
> ParseNamespaceItem flags. I'm not sure it's totally bulletproof,
> but it's likely good enough for a HINT.
Wow, this is great. I can see how people would be confused by the need
for LATERAL, and this is really a great boost for them.
> I felt that the conditional-expression nests in the existing ereport
> calls were nearly unintelligible already, so I rearranged the logic
Wow, I am glad you mentioned this. I never saw a ? b ? c : d : e used
before and I had to look it up, and I have been around C for a long time:
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/c-nested-ternary-operator/
> to duplicate portions of the ereports instead. That could be debated
> perhaps. Also, as written some paths through errorMissingColumn
> will invoke the findNSItemForRTE search twice. I'm not too fussed
> about that: it's a pretty cheap search and anyway nobody should be
> bothering to shave microseconds off an error reporting path.
Exactly.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
