Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label
Date
Msg-id ZA53Gi2SdK8NEobq@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:59:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> My apologies for the long message, but this deserves some attention,
> IMHO.

Note: A CF entry has been added as of [1], and I have added an item in
the list of live issues on the open item page for 16.

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/4244/
[2]: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items#Live_issues
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count