Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Date
Msg-id ZC9c2oEsANVKicmo@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 01:50:00AM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Yes, that was a bad oversight, which would've shown up in tests on a system
> with an endianness that my computer doesn't have...

I don't think that we have many bigendian animals in the buildfarm,
either..

> That looks fine to me. Thanks for picking this up and fixing the issue.

Okay, cool!
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: what should install-world do when docs are not available?