Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof
Date
Msg-id a418e765-2298-eb46-0fe0-26fdb000d05b@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On 4/23/22 13:14, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> PostgreSQL 14.2-1
> 
> Dear readers,
> 

> I can't find anything in the changelog saying that "is of"
> was removed. For what it's worth, nothing in the docs ever
> said it existed either (though it did, as per real life).

It works through version 13. I also am not seeing, yet, where it was 
removed in 14.


> Is there anything obvious I am missing for easily
> resurrecting the above "is of" use ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Karsten
> --
> GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: PG14: "is of" vs pg_typeof