The process names shown in pg_stat_activity.backend_type as of PG10 and
the process names used in the ps display are in some cases gratuitously
different, so here is a patch to make them more alike. Of course it
could be debated in some cases which spelling was better.
As an aside, is there a reason why the archiver process is not included
in pg_stat_activity?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
