Sorry for the late reply.
On 8/29/25 20:27, Sami Imseih wrote:
> This version needs another rebase, but I don't think this is a proper solution
> yet. It's dropping the portal in an area I don't think we should be concerned
> with,
You might be right, I don't know... my understanding of the code isn't
good enough.
> and it's not covering some simple cases, like a bind/execute followed
> by a simple query.
I don't understand this part, I think that my tests prove the contrary,
don't they?
